![]() ![]() Nevertheless, software significantly influences the response. For the Mean distance response, slices and the software-slices interaction are not significant. As for the RMS (root mean square) distance response, software, slices, and the softwareslices interaction are not significant. However, the software-slices interaction did not have a significant influence. Results: The ANOVA results for the Max (maximum distance between meshes) response shows that software and slices are significant factors. The analyzed parameters were the distance differences between the reference and the alternative models, as well as the qualitative curvature analysis. The MeshLab software was used for this purpose. The quality of the reconstructed volumes was verified by comparing the reference volume reconstructed with the total number of images/slices vs. The number of images included in the volume was modified, and the results were compared. Method: For the 3D reconstruction, a computerized tomography taken from a volunteer was used, as well as two software applications specialized in DICOM image reconstruction (Mimics Research and 3DSlicer). In this work, a three-dimensional reconstruction of the tibia and fibula was performed for biomechanical applications with the purpose of defining the 3D reconstruction parameters that allow reducing patients’ radiation exposure and computational costs. Among them, lower limb fractures have a large impact on the costs related to orthopedic treatments. ![]() Context: Non-fatal injuries represent a public health issue. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |